Is all press good press?
Monday, June 30th, 2008In a word: no.
An old adage says that “all press is good press,” meaning that if you are getting noticed at all, even with a negative portrayal, that still increases your visibility and recognition amongst the masses, which is a net benefit. I think if you are either really big (like Nike), or really small (like an unknown startup no one’s heard of), there might be some truth to the idea. But for the VAST majority of people in the middle, I simply don’t agree.
Nike doesn’t want to be known as a sweat shop that abuses Malaysian children with unsafe work conditions at slave wages, but they are. Does it matter very much? For Nike, probably not. They have the athletic endorsements and the marketing budget to overcome negative press (and yes, it shouldn’t be ignored). However, Nike is such a large, recognized, long standing and wealthy brand that bad press isn’t that difficult to deal with. It keeps their name in the press, most people forget the bad stories, and just remember Nike when they think of shoes and sports.
Tiny startups can usually survive bad press, and possibly even benefit from getting on someone’s radar. They might get some new user signups simply by getting trashed on Techcrunch. This could increase their user base, and perhaps give them an opportunity to improve their site / collect feedback. But it can also lead to a negative long-term impression in the public eye, which requires careful and intelligent efforts to fix (of which PR is a component, but it better not be the only one!). Ultimately you still need to deal with bad press on some level, or it will work against you in the long run.
Small to medium businesses definitely do not want bad press (also, we’re not talking about ‘one single negative blog post’, we’re talking about a series of notable posts/articles). It is not somehow “good” even though it’s bad. Small to medium companies don’t have the anonymity of tiny startups, nor do they have the budget and inertia of massive, long standing brands.
Take Twitter for instance. Twitter is a cool service, and I use it a lot. I enjoy it. But it fails… constantly a lot. The folks at Twitter have worked hard to improve, and have a very admirable, self-mocking attitude about the whole thing. They use a critter called the “Fail Whale” when their site is down, as a tongue-in-cheek means of acknowledging that they’re having technical difficulties. But their failure rate is so high that it strains the utility of their service, and some of its big early adopters and users are either moving or considering moving to new services. This leads to a lot of bad press, in spite of their self-deprecations. Initially, that press was jocular and supportive. Now it’s way past that. The Fail Whale is now ironic, and not in the good way.
The Twitter example demonstrates that a lot of negative press attention can, and will, hurt your image. As we’ve said before, it’s not just about the marketing to fix the problem – the problems themselves must be fixed before any PR can even begin (you don’t mend a broken leg with a bandaid). All press is not good press.



